RTX A4500 vs GeForce GTX 670M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670M with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670M
2012
1536 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.56

RTX A4500 outperforms GTX 670M by a whopping 1130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.1719.23
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF114GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3367168
Core clock speed598 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate33.49369.6
Floating-point processing power0.8037 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs56224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB20 GB
Memory bus width192bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670M 4.56
RTX A4500 56.09
+1130%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670M 1756
RTX A4500 21613
+1131%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 670M 6448
RTX A4500 142463
+2109%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
−1054%
450−500
+1054%
Full HD40
−1025%
450−500
+1025%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−1122%
550−600
+1122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−1122%
550−600
+1122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−1122%
550−600
+1122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

This is how GTX 670M and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 1054% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4500 is 1025% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 56.09
Recency 22 March 2012 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 670M has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 1130% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670M is a notebook card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 92 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 194 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.