GeForce RTX 5090 vs GTX 660M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660M with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.60

RTX 5090 outperforms GTX 660M by a whopping 2678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7131
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.28
Power efficiency5.1912.54
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK107GB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38421760
Core clock speed835 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate30.401,637
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs32680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660M 3.60
RTX 5090 100.00
+2678%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660M 1451
RTX 5090 40367
+2682%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p32
−2556%
850−900
+2556%
Full HD35
−491%
207
+491%
1200p38
−2663%
1050−1100
+2663%
1440p6−7
−2967%
184
+2967%
4K5−6
−2720%
141
+2720%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.66
1440pno data10.86
4Kno data14.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2044%
190−200
+2044%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1070%
110−120
+1070%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2044%
190−200
+2044%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−2547%
450−500
+2547%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−4440%
220−230
+4440%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1925%
160−170
+1925%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−1200%
150−160
+1200%
Valorant 8−9
−6188%
500−550
+6188%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1070%
110−120
+1070%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2044%
190−200
+2044%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%
Dota 2 10−12
−1482%
170−180
+1482%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−695%
159
+695%
Fortnite 21−24
−1300%
300−350
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−2547%
450−500
+2547%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−4440%
220−230
+4440%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1925%
160−170
+1925%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−552%
210−220
+552%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−1200%
150−160
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1238%
170−180
+1238%
Valorant 8−9
−6188%
500−550
+6188%
World of Tanks 89
−213%
270−280
+213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1070%
110−120
+1070%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2144%
202
+2144%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%
Dota 2 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−675%
150−160
+675%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−2547%
450−500
+2547%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−4440%
220−230
+4440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−552%
210−220
+552%
Valorant 8−9
−6188%
500−550
+6188%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−5133%
150−160
+5133%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−2592%
700−750
+2592%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
World of Tanks 27−30
−1811%
500−550
+1811%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1640%
85−90
+1640%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
Valorant 10−12
−3664%
400−450
+3664%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1640%
174
+1640%
Dota 2 16−18
−1038%
180−190
+1038%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 167
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1800%
200−210
+1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−450%
55
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Dota 2 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2525%
100−110
+2525%
Fortnite 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−5500%
110−120
+5500%
Valorant 3−4
−8000%
240−250
+8000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 183
+0%
183
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

This is how GTX 660M and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 2556% faster in 900p
  • RTX 5090 is 491% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 2663% faster in 1200p
  • RTX 5090 is 2967% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 2720% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5090 is 8000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is ahead in 42 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 100.00
Recency 22 March 2012 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 575 Watt

GTX 660M has 1050% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 2677.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 213 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1502 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.