Quadro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 660

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 140 Watt
10.39
+0.5%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking439441
Place by popularity76not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.423.63
Power efficiency5.099.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK106GM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 September 2012 (12 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M2000 has 6% better value for money than GTX 660.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960768
Core clock speed980 MHz796 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate82.5655.82
Floating-point processing power1.981 TFLOPS1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs8048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm201 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/sUp to 106 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 10.39
+0.5%
Quadro M2000 10.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 4004
+0.5%
Quadro M2000 3985

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 660 11368
Quadro M2000 14562
+28.1%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 660 11395
Quadro M2000 14286
+25.4%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 660 8583
Quadro M2000 13100
+52.6%

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 660 33
Quadro M2000 34
+3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.879.73

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.39 10.34
Recency 6 September 2012 8 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 660 has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 660 and Quadro M2000.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 is a desktop card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 4300 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 210 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.