GeForce GTX 660 vs Quadro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.30
+67.3%

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking296405
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.802.40
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM204GK106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2015 (8 years ago)6 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 $229
Current price$314 (0.4x MSRP)$172 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M4000 has 350% better value for money than GTX 660.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1664960
CUDA coresno data960
Core clock speed773 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1033 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate80.3978.4 billion/sec
Floating-point performance2,573 gflops1,981 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm9.5" (24.1 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinOne 6-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed6008 MHz6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s144.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model55.1
OpenGL4.54.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M4000 17.30
+67.3%
GTX 660 10.34

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M4000 6687
+67.2%
GTX 660 3999

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 67% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M4000 18028
+59.8%
GTX 660 11285

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 60% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro M4000 19929
+73.7%
GTX 660 11472

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 74% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M4000 16648
+94%
GTX 660 8583

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 94% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M4000 55
+66.7%
GTX 660 33

Quadro M4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 67% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+59.6%
47
−59.6%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.30 10.34
Recency 29 June 2015 6 September 2012
Cost $791 $229
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 140 Watt

The Quadro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 218 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3996 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.