GeForce RTX 4080 vs GTX 660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce RTX 4080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 140 Watt
10.36

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 660 by a whopping 765% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4053
Place by popularity70not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.4217.35
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGK106AD103-300-A1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 September 2012 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $1,199
Current price$172 (0.8x MSRP)$1451 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 has 617% better value for money than GTX 660.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9609728
CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed980 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate78.4 billion/sec761.5
Floating-point performance1,981 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)310 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s22400 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 10.36
RTX 4080 89.64
+765%

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 660 by 765% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 4000
RTX 4080 34613
+765%

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 660 by 765% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 660 5040
RTX 4080 57903
+1049%

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 660 by 1049% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−417%
243
+417%
1440p18−21
−867%
174
+867%
4K12−14
−833%
112
+833%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−863%
231
+863%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−806%
140−150
+806%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−773%
262
+773%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−804%
240−250
+804%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−863%
231
+863%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−857%
200−210
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−817%
270−280
+817%
Hitman 3 14−16
−779%
120−130
+779%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−769%
478
+769%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−850%
150−160
+850%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−778%
527
+778%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−810%
191
+810%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−806%
140−150
+806%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−804%
217
+804%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−804%
240−250
+804%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−775%
210
+775%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−857%
200−210
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−817%
270−280
+817%
Hitman 3 14−16
−779%
120−130
+779%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−843%
350−400
+843%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−822%
83
+822%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−831%
512
+831%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−808%
545
+808%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−844%
150−160
+844%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−806%
140−150
+806%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−800%
189
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−805%
190
+805%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−817%
270−280
+817%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−780%
396
+780%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−773%
480
+773%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−859%
259
+859%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−811%
164
+811%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−822%
160−170
+822%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−800%
140−150
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−856%
153
+856%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−833%
110−120
+833%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−821%
129
+821%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−857%
201
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−796%
240−250
+796%
Hitman 3 14−16
−836%
130−140
+836%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−849%
332
+849%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−831%
149
+831%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−767%
390
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−810%
191
+810%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−788%
142
+788%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−821%
120−130
+821%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−780%
85−90
+780%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−886%
65−70
+886%
Hitman 3 9−10
−822%
80−85
+822%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−869%
150−160
+869%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−850%
133
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−790%
187
+790%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−811%
80−85
+811%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−900%
100
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−800%
63
+800%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−848%
190−200
+848%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−857%
201
+857%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−829%
130
+829%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−770%
87
+770%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−825%
110−120
+825%

This is how GTX 660 and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 417% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 867% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 833% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.36 89.64
Recency 6 September 2012 20 September 2022
Cost $229 $1199
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 320 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 4041 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3896 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.