Tesla M40 vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M SLI with Tesla M40, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580M SLI
2011
100 Watt
10.28

Tesla M40 outperforms GTX 580M SLI by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GM200
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed620 MHz948 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1112 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data213.5
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p68
−150%
170−180
+150%
Full HD90
−156%
230−240
+156%
1200p81
−159%
210−220
+159%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−154%
170−180
+154%
Hitman 3 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−155%
140−150
+155%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−154%
170−180
+154%
Hitman 3 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−155%
140−150
+155%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−154%
170−180
+154%
Hitman 3 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−155%
140−150
+155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Hitman 3 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Hitman 3 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

This is how GTX 580M SLI and Tesla M40 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M40 is 150% faster in 900p
  • Tesla M40 is 156% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla M40 is 159% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.28 27.14
Recency 6 January 2011 10 November 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 580M SLI has 150% lower power consumption.

Tesla M40, on the other hand, has a 164% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580M SLI is a notebook card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M SLI
GeForce GTX 580M SLI
NVIDIA Tesla M40
Tesla M40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 84 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.