GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GTX 570 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 570 Rev. 2
2010
1280 MB GDDR5, 219 Watt
6.12

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms GTX 570 Rev. 2 by a whopping 1060% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9149.03
Power efficiency2.2319.85
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 4070 Ti has 5288% better value for money than GTX 570 Rev. 2.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4807680
Core clock speed732 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate43.92626.4
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPS40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs4080
TMUs60240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm285 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB12 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−1139%
223
+1139%
1440p10−12
−1290%
139
+1290%
4K7−8
−1143%
87
+1143%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.39
−441%
3.58
+441%
1440p34.90
−507%
5.75
+507%
4K49.86
−443%
9.18
+443%
  • RTX 4070 Ti has 441% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti has 507% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti has 443% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 316
+0%
316
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 236
+0%
236
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 253
+0%
253
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 218
+0%
218
+0%
Far Cry 5 211
+0%
211
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 244
+0%
244
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 180
+0%
180
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 185
+0%
185
+0%
Dota 2 259
+0%
259
+0%
Far Cry 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 228
+0%
228
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 197
+0%
197
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 453
+0%
453
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 167
+0%
167
+0%
Dota 2 243
+0%
243
+0%
Far Cry 5 189
+0%
189
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221
+0%
221
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 156
+0%
156
+0%
Metro Exodus 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+0%
149
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 226
+0%
226
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GTX 570 Rev. 2 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1139% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1290% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1143% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.12 71.00
Recency 7 December 2010 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 285 Watt

GTX 570 Rev. 2 has 30.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1060.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7376 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.