FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

Place in the ranking	570	456
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.56
Power efficiency	4.52	4.54
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	N12E-GS	Tonga
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)	1 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	775 MHz	920 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	117.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.768 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.3
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−40%

14−16
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −42.9%	60−65 +42.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −42.9%	60−65 +42.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −42.9%	60−65 +42.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−41.2%

24−27
+41.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Hitman 3	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −46.3%	60−65 +46.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−45.5%

16−18
+45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−42.9%

10−11

+42.9%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.48	9.77
Recency	6 January 2011	1 February 2016
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt

GTX 560M SLI has 50% lower power consumption.

FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has a 50.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro S7150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook card while FirePro S7150 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.