Arc A580 vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI

Place in performance ranking	444	85
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.84	39.36
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	no data
GPU code name	N11E-GTX-A1	DG2-512
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)	10 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price	$149	$337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A580 has 345% better value for money than GTX 485M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	3072
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	384.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Arc A580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	no data	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M SLI 9.22

Arc A580 41.43
+349%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce GTX 485M SLI by 349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M SLI 5334

Arc A580 35210
+560%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce GTX 485M SLI by 560% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M SLI 24830

Arc A580 95677
+285%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce GTX 485M SLI by 285% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	89 −293%	350−400 +293%
Full HD	95 −4.2%	99 +4.2%
1440p	12−14 −367%	56 +367%
4K	8−9 −350%	36 +350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−329%

60−65
+329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	no data
Battlefield 5	27−30	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Hitman 3	16−18	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	27−30	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	no data
Battlefield 5	27−30	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Hitman 3	16−18	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	27−30	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	16−18	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20	no data
Metro Exodus	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7	no data
Hitman 3	5−6	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	5−6	no data
Forza Horizon 4	10−12	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11	no data
Metro Exodus	9−10	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	no data