Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce GTX 480

Place in performance ranking	397	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.27	23.67
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	GF100	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 December 2010 (13 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$999
Current price	$15.99 (0x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 1764% better value for money than GTX 480.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	3072
CUDA cores	480	no data
Core clock speed	700 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	190 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	42 billion/sec	499.2
Floating-point performance	1,345.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	241 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1848 MHz (3696 data rate)	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI	4x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 480 10.60

PRO W7700 52.36
+394%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms GeForce GTX 480 by 394% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 480 4102

PRO W7700 20263
+394%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms GeForce GTX 480 by 394% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−369%

75−80
+369%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −372%	170−180 +372%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −386%	180−190 +386%
Hitman 3	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −372%	170−180 +372%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −386%	180−190 +386%
Hitman 3	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −372%	170−180 +372%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −386%	180−190 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −367%	70−75 +367%
Hitman 3	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −364%	65−70 +364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −371%	80−85 +371%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Hitman 3	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.60	52.36
Recency	7 December 2010	13 November 2023
Cost	$499	$999
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	190 Watt