Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 480
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 396 | 446 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 1.27 | 7.12 |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | GF100 | Blackcomb XT |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 6 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Current price | $15.99 (0x MSRP) | $170 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
HD 6970M Crossfire has 461% better value for money than GTX 480.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 1920 |
CUDA cores | 480 | no data |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 680 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | no data |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 42 billion/sec | no data |
Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | no data |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | no data |
SLI options | + | no data |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2x2 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | no data |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.2 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | no data |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire outperforms GeForce GTX 480 by 11% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 110−120
+17%
| 94
−17%
|
Full HD | 120−130
+17.6%
| 102
−17.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+18.8%
|
30−35
−18.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+17.4%
|
21−24
−17.4%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+18.8%
|
30−35
−18.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+17.4%
|
21−24
−17.4%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 16−18
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+18.8%
|
30−35
−18.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
Hitman 3 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18
−18.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
This is how GTX 480 and HD 6970M Crossfire compete in popular games:
- GTX 480 is 17% faster than HD 6970M Crossfire in 900p
- GTX 480 is 17.6% faster than HD 6970M Crossfire in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 480 is 50% faster than the HD 6970M Crossfire.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 480 is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (1%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 10.60 | 9.00 |
The GeForce GTX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.