GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GTX 470M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 470M SLI outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 548 | 534 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.51 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | Vega Renoir | N11E-GT |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 November 2010 (13 years ago) |
Current price | no data | $149 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 535 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GTX 470M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
Memory bus width | no data | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1250 MHz |
Shared memory | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 11 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 470M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms GeForce GTX 470M SLI by 3% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 60−65
−10%
| 66
+10%
|
Full HD | 20
−265%
| 73
+265%
|
1440p | 28
+3.7%
| 27−30
−3.7%
|
4K | 17
−5.9%
| 18−20
+5.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11 | no data |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 14−16 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 11 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 25 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 23 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 22 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 26 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14 | no data |
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 13 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 14−16 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 12−14 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 73 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 9 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 17 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 50 | no data |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 14−16 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 17 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 11 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27 | no data |
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14 | no data |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | no data |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 10−11 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 6−7 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3−4 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | no data |
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12 | no data |
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 2−3 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 | no data |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 7−8 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3 | no data |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8 | no data |
This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GTX 470M SLI compete in popular games:
- GTX 470M SLI is 10% faster in 900p
- GTX 470M SLI is 265% faster in 1080p
- RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 4% faster in 1440p
- GTX 470M SLI is 6% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.26 | 6.65 |
Recency | 7 January 2020 | 1 November 2010 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GTX 470M SLI.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.