Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) vs GeForce GTX 465
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 465 outperforms Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 571% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 522 | 1061 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.46 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) |
| GPU code name | GF100 | Stoney Ridge |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 May 2010 (13 years ago) | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | no data |
| Current price | $15.99 (0.1x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 352 | 128 |
| CUDA cores | 352 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 607 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 3100 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion/sec | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops | no data |
| Compute performance | 30x | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | no data |
| SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.6 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI | no data |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.91 | 1.03 |
| Recency | 31 May 2010 | 1 June 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 15 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop card while Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
