Mobility Radeon HD 5850 vs GeForce GTX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 with Mobility Radeon HD 5850, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
5.86
+199%

GTX 460 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5850 by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking562857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.000.30
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF104Broadway-PRO
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 July 2010 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$128 (0.6x MSRP)$153

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 460 has 233% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 5850.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336800
Core clock speed675 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt39 Watt
Texture fill rate37.8020.00
Floating-point performance907.2 gflops800.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 460 and Mobility Radeon HD 5850 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)no data
Height4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin & 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p55−60
+189%
19
−189%
Full HD65−70
+183%
23
−183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how GTX 460 and ATI Mobility HD 5850 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 is 189% faster in 900p
  • GTX 460 is 183% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.86 1.96
Recency 12 July 2010 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 39 Watt

The GeForce GTX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTX 460
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 942 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.