Arc A770M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 SE with Arc A770M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 SE
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
5.18

Arc A770M outperforms GTX 460 SE by a whopping 670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking58496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF104Alchemist
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 November 2010 (13 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data
Current price$350 (2.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288512
CUDA cores288no data
Core clock speed650 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt (120 - 150 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature104 °Cno data
Texture fill rate31.2 billion/sec422.4
Floating-point performance748.8 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 460 SE and Arc A770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin & 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Number of display connectors2no data
Display Connectors2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460 SE 5.18
Arc A770M 39.89
+670%

Arc A770M outperforms GeForce GTX 460 SE by 670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 460 SE 2001
Arc A770M 11542
+477%

Arc A770M outperforms GeForce GTX 460 SE by 477% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−692%
95
+692%
1440p7−8
−671%
54
+671%
4K4−5
−800%
36
+800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−707%
113
+707%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−700%
120−130
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−710%
80−85
+710%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−692%
95
+692%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−725%
95−100
+725%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−739%
150−160
+739%
Hitman 3 10−11
−720%
80−85
+720%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−738%
176
+738%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−714%
110−120
+714%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−753%
256
+753%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−717%
95−100
+717%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−700%
120−130
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−710%
80−85
+710%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−756%
77
+756%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−725%
95−100
+725%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−739%
150−160
+739%
Hitman 3 10−11
−720%
80−85
+720%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−671%
160−170
+671%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−700%
48
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−681%
211
+681%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−724%
173
+724%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−717%
95−100
+717%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−710%
80−85
+710%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−738%
67
+738%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−739%
150−160
+739%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−775%
105
+775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−752%
179
+752%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−750%
51
+750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−717%
95−100
+717%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−756%
75−80
+756%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−675%
90−95
+675%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−780%
44
+780%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−710%
81
+710%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−740%
80−85
+740%
Hitman 3 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−720%
82
+720%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−708%
95−100
+708%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−729%
55−60
+729%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Hitman 3 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−675%
62
+675%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
22
+1000%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−783%
53
+783%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−733%
50
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%

This is how GTX 460 SE and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 692% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 671% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.18 39.89
Recency 15 November 2010 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE is a desktop card while Arc A770M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 136 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 86 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.