ATI Radeon HD 5870 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Radeon HD 5870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 768MB
4.37

ATI HD 5870 outperforms GTX 460 768MB by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.59
Power efficiencyno data2.11
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameno dataCypress
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data23 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3361600
Core clock speed675 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data188 Watt
Texture fill rateno data68.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.72 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data153.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460 768MB 4.37
ATI HD 5870 5.76
+31.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 460 768MB 2092
ATI HD 5870 2530
+20.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−25%
55−60
+25%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Elden Ring 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Elden Ring 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Fortnite 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
World of Tanks 70−75
−30.1%
95−100
+30.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Valorant 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
World of Tanks 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and ATI HD 5870 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5870 is 25% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.37 5.76

ATI HD 5870 has a 31.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 5870 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
ATI Radeon HD 5870
Radeon HD 5870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 96 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 234 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.