GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon HD 6970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6970
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 550 Watt
7.38
+68.9%

HD 6970 outperforms GTX 460 768MB by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.05no data
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCaymanno data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536336
Core clock speedno data675 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,640 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)550 Wattno data
Texture fill rate84.48no data
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1800 MHz

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.38
+68.9%
GTX 460 768MB 4.37

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6970 3470
+65.9%
GTX 460 768MB 2092

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+59.1%
44
−59.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Elden Ring 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Dota 2 24−27
+160%
10
−160%
Elden Ring 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Fortnite 40−45
+76%
24−27
−76%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+73.3%
15
−73.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+55.3%
35−40
−55.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Valorant 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
World of Tanks 110−120
+54.8%
70−75
−54.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Dota 2 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+55.3%
35−40
−55.3%
Valorant 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Elden Ring 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
World of Tanks 50−55
+71%
30−35
−71%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Elden Ring 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Fortnite 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Valorant 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how HD 6970 and GTX 460 768MB compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970 is 59% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6970 is 450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 6970 surpassed GTX 460 768MB in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.38 4.37

HD 6970 has a 68.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 6970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 96 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.