GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs 765M SLI
Aggregated performance score
765M SLI outperforms 285M SLI by 153% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 395 | 641 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 11.40 | 1.65 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | G9x (2007−2010) |
| GPU code name | no data | N10E-GTX |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 (10 years ago) | 2 March 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Current price | $149 | $149 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 765M SLI has 591% better value for money than GTX 285M SLI.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 2540 Million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GeForce GTX 285M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| SLI options | + | no data |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 10 |
| CUDA | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
765M SLI outperforms 285M SLI by 153% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
765M SLI outperforms 285M SLI by 123% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 71
+18.3%
| 60
−18.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+86.7%
|
14−16
−86.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
+200%
|
9−10
−200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+109%
|
10−12
−109%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+86.7%
|
14−16
−86.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
+200%
|
9−10
−200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+109%
|
10−12
−109%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Hitman 3 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+171%
|
7−8
−171%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Hitman 3 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
This is how GTX 765M SLI and GTX 285M SLI compete in popular games:
- GTX 765M SLI is 18.3% faster than GTX 285M SLI in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 765M SLI is 800% faster than the GTX 285M SLI.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 765M SLI surpassed GTX 285M SLI in all 60 of our tests.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 10.61 | 4.20 |
| Recency | 30 May 2013 | 2 March 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
