Tesla M2070 vs GeForce GTX 280

Place in performance ranking	733	635
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.11	0.11
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GT200	GF100
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	$3,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 280 and Tesla M2070 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	448
CUDA cores	240	no data
Core clock speed	602 MHz	574 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	236 Watt	225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	48.16	32.14
Floating-point performance	0.6221 gflops	1.03 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	512 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1107 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	141.7 GB/s	150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVDual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.37	4.88
Recency	16 June 2008	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	236 Watt	225 Watt

Tesla M2070 has a 44.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 4.9% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280 is a desktop card while Tesla M2070 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.