Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Radeon Pro SSG, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.58
+17.6%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Pro SSG by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161200
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.741.15
Power efficiency19.307.57
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTU116Fiji
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)26 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 3703% better value for money than Pro SSG.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364096
Core clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate169.9268.8
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.58
+17.6%
Pro SSG 28.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12907
+17.6%
Pro SSG 10971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
1440p60
+20%
50−55
−20%
4K39
+30%
30−35
−30%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.71
+4243%
117.64
−4243%
1440p4.65
+4201%
199.98
−4201%
4K7.15
+4559%
333.30
−4559%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 4243% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 4201% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 4559% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+20%
65−70
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+20%
75−80
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+20%
130−140
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Metro Exodus 98
+22.5%
80−85
−22.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+19%
100−105
−19%
Valorant 161
+23.8%
130−140
−23.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 123
+23%
100−105
−23%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Dota 2 140
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 118
+18%
100−105
−18%
Fortnite 134
+21.8%
110−120
−21.8%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+27%
100−105
−27%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+20%
60−65
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+19%
100−105
−19%
Metro Exodus 68
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+24.7%
150−160
−24.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+21.1%
95−100
−21.1%
Valorant 82
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
World of Tanks 270−280
+20.9%
230−240
−20.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+20%
65−70
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 168
+20%
140−150
−20%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 5 66
+20%
55−60
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+22.5%
80−85
−22.5%
Valorant 118
+18%
100−105
−18%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
World of Tanks 210−220
+19.4%
180−190
−19.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+26%
50−55
−26%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+17.8%
90−95
−17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+20%
65−70
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Metro Exodus 65
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Valorant 82
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Dota 2 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Metro Exodus 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+17.8%
90−95
−17.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 94
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Fortnite 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Valorant 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and Pro SSG compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 21% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 20% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.58 28.55
Recency 22 February 2019 26 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro SSG in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon Pro SSG is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8133 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 3258 votes

Rate Radeon Pro SSG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.