GeForce GT 430 vs GTX 1660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce GT 430, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.56
+2051%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 2051% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161970
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.860.05
Power efficiency19.302.20
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU116GF108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)11 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 87620% better value for money than GT 430.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
CUDA cores per GPUno data96
Core clock speed1500 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt49 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate169.911.20
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s25.6 - 28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.56
+2051%
GT 430 1.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12904
+2047%
GT 430 601

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
+2126%
GT 430 720

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Ti 60757
+2629%
GT 430 2226

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+2475%
4−5
−2475%
1440p60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
4K39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.71
+629%
19.75
−629%
1440p4.65
+749%
39.50
−749%
4K7.15
+1004%
79.00
−1004%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 629% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 749% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 1004% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Elden Ring 84
+8300%
1−2
−8300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+4400%
2−3
−4400%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+1633%
9−10
−1633%
Metro Exodus 98 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+1600%
7−8
−1600%
Valorant 161
+2200%
7−8
−2200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 123
+6050%
2−3
−6050%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Dota 2 140
+6900%
2−3
−6900%
Elden Ring 116
+11500%
1−2
−11500%
Far Cry 5 118
+973%
10−12
−973%
Fortnite 134
+1814%
7−8
−1814%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+1311%
9−10
−1311%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+5850%
2−3
−5850%
Metro Exodus 68 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+1069%
16−18
−1069%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+543%
7−8
−543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
Valorant 82
+2633%
3−4
−2633%
World of Tanks 270−280
+769%
30−35
−769%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Dota 2 168
+8300%
2−3
−8300%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+718%
10−12
−718%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+1122%
9−10
−1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+513%
16−18
−513%
Valorant 118
+2260%
5−6
−2260%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
Elden Ring 62 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1650%
10−11
−1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28 0−1
World of Tanks 210−220
+2289%
9−10
−2289%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+2020%
5−6
−2020%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+2500%
3−4
−2500%
Metro Exodus 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Valorant 82
+1071%
7−8
−1071%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Dota 2 56
+250%
16−18
−250%
Elden Ring 25 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+273%
14−16
−273%
Metro Exodus 21 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+2550%
4−5
−2550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+273%
14−16
−273%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 94
+488%
16−18
−488%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Fortnite 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Valorant 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and GT 430 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 2475% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 2900% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 3800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 11500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti surpassed GT 430 in all 45 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.56 1.56
Recency 22 February 2019 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 49 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 2051.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

GT 430, on the other hand, has 144.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8069 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1134 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.