GeForce GT 620 vs GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce GT 620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
28.89
+3299%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms GT 620 by a whopping 3299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1751124
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.760.02
Power efficiency19.061.37
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU116GF108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $39.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti has 193700% better value for money than GT 620.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
Core clock speed1500 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt49 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate169.911.20
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm145 mm
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortDual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti 28.89
+3299%
GT 620 0.85

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12910
+3280%
GT 620 382

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Ti 61014
+3754%
GT 620 1583

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
1440p59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
4K39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68
+397%
13.33
−397%
1440p4.73
+746%
39.99
−746%
4K7.15
+459%
39.99
−459%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 397% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 746% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 459% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+3500%
5−6
−3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 129
+4200%
3−4
−4200%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+3500%
5−6
−3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Far Cry 5 109
+3533%
3−4
−3533%
Fortnite 247
+3429%
7−8
−3429%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+4267%
3−4
−4267%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+3467%
3−4
−3467%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200
+3900%
5−6
−3900%
Valorant 190−200
+3800%
5−6
−3800%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+3633%
3−4
−3633%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+3500%
5−6
−3500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3338%
8−9
−3338%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Dota 2 181
+3520%
5−6
−3520%
Far Cry 5 99
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
Fortnite 143
+3475%
4−5
−3475%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+3967%
3−4
−3967%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+3867%
3−4
−3867%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Metro Exodus 55
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
+3650%
4−5
−3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+3767%
3−4
−3767%
Valorant 190−200
+3800%
5−6
−3800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+3300%
3−4
−3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Dota 2 168
+4100%
4−5
−4100%
Far Cry 5 94
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+4750%
2−3
−4750%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+4200%
3−4
−4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Valorant 118
+3833%
3−4
−3833%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
+3800%
3−4
−3800%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+3500%
6−7
−3500%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Metro Exodus 33 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+3400%
5−6
−3400%
Valorant 230−240
+3767%
6−7
−3767%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+3700%
2−3
−3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 27 0−1
Far Cry 5 67
+6600%
1−2
−6600%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75
+3650%
2−3
−3650%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 21 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Valorant 180−190
+3660%
5−6
−3660%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 11 0−1
Dota 2 94
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Far Cry 5 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25 0−1

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and GT 620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 3367% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 5800% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 3800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.89 0.85
Recency 22 February 2019 15 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 49 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 3298.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

GT 620, on the other hand, has 144.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 620 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GeForce GT 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8417 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 448 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or GeForce GT 620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.