Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	198	411
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Power efficiency	24.87	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Xe² (2025)
GPU code name	TU116	Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	7
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1590 MHz	1850 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	152.6	no data
Floating-point processing power	4.884 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	96	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_2
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 27.80
+143%

Arc Graphics 130V 11.42

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 20119
+111%

Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818
+79.5%

Arc Graphics 130V 8255

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 5659
+74.6%

Arc Graphics 130V 3242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	89 +178%	32 −178%
1440p	57 +171%	21−24 −171%
4K	36 +157%	14−16 −157%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.57	no data
1440p	4.02	no data
4K	6.36	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	63 +53.7%	41 −53.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +146%	35−40 −146%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	89 +128%	35−40 −128%
Counter-Strike 2	54 +74.2%	31 −74.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 +163%	24−27 −163%
Forza Horizon 4	147 +107%	71 −107%
Forza Horizon 5	69 +123%	30−35 −123%
Metro Exodus	88 +167%	30−35 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +230%	30−33 −230%
Valorant	148 +215%	45−50 −215%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	112 +187%	35−40 −187%
Counter-Strike 2	49 +75%	28 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +178%	18−20 −178%
Dota 2	111 +171%	41 −171%
Far Cry 5	75 +168%	28 −168%
Fortnite	130−140 +104%	65−70 −104%
Forza Horizon 4	118 +103%	58 −103%
Forza Horizon 5	60 +93.5%	30−35 −93.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	105 +144%	40−45 −144%
Metro Exodus	63 +90.9%	30−35 −90.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	232 +161%	85−90 −161%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +167%	35−40 −167%
Valorant	71 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +65.2%	160−170 −65.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +100%	35−40 −100%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +124%	25 −124%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Dota 2	116 +158%	45−50 −158%
Far Cry 5	119 +153%	45−50 −153%
Forza Horizon 4	101 +110%	48 −110%
Forza Horizon 5	50 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +93.3%	85−90 −93.3%
Valorant	125 +166%	45−50 −166%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +200%	16−18 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +150%	70−75 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	26 +160%	10−11 −160%
World of Tanks	180−190 +124%	80−85 −124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55 +139%	21−24 −139%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +150%	10−11 −150%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +226%	27−30 −226%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +182%	27−30 −182%
Forza Horizon 5	42 +133%	18−20 −133%
Metro Exodus	60 +150%	24−27 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Valorant	81 +179%	27−30 −179%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Dota 2	50−55 +136%	21−24 −136%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +136%	21−24 −136%
Metro Exodus	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90 +157%	35−40 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +113%	8−9 −113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +136%	21−24 −136%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27 +145%	10−12 −145%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +150%	4−5 −150%
Dota 2	85 +183%	30−33 −183%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +160%	14−16 −160%
Fortnite	37 +185%	12−14 −185%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Forza Horizon 5	22 +144%	9−10 −144%
Valorant	39 +225%	12−14 −225%