GeForce MX570 A vs GTX 1660 Super

Place in performance ranking	148	323
Place by popularity	8	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	28.60	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Turing TU116	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 October 2019 (4 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data
Current price	$277 (1.2x MSRP)	$1574

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	2048
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.1	73.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+114%

MX570 A 15.43

GTX 1660 Super outperforms MX570 A by 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Super 12771
+114%

MX570 A 5957

GTX 1660 Super outperforms MX570 A by 114% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90 +125%	40−45 −125%
1440p	54 +125%	24−27 −125%
4K	30 +150%	12−14 −150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

160−170

+111%

76
−111%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	180−190 +105%	88 −105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +112%	66 −112%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +106%	100−110 −106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +113%	80 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +106%	63 −106%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +103%	70−75 −103%
Far Cry New Dawn	250−260 +107%	121 −107%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +108%	144 −108%
Hitman 3	160−170 +108%	77 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +88.2%	186 −88.2%
Metro Exodus	300−310 +108%	144 −108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	170−180 +113%	80 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +84%	163 −84%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +105%	83 −105%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +105%	73 −105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +108%	48 −108%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +106%	100−110 −106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +108%	72 −108%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +112%	52 −112%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +103%	70−75 −103%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +109%	86 −109%
Forza Horizon 4	280−290 +111%	130−140 −111%
Hitman 3	130−140 +106%	63 −106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	600−650 +107%	290 −107%
Metro Exodus	230−240 +107%	111 −107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +103%	64 −103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +109%	129 −109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	240−250 +112%	113 −112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +92.3%	208 −92.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +96.1%	51 −96.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +105%	44 −105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +100%	55 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−105 +104%	49 −104%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +103%	70−75 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +106%	107 −106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +112%	99 −112%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +114%	112 −114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +113%	61 −113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +110%	31 −110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+111%

57
−111%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +106%	60−65 −106%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 +107%	82 −107%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +113%	40 −113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +106%	34 −106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +108%	53 −108%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +112%	26 −112%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +100%	65 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +114%	84 −114%
Hitman 3	90−95 +109%	43 −109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +111%	71 −111%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +109%	67 −109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +113%	80 −113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +111%	45−50 −111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +108%	24 −108%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+114%

56
−114%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +112%	30−35 −112%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +110%	31 −110%
Hitman 3	50−55 +100%	25 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +113%	40−45 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +104%	27 −104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +113%	40 −113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +108%	24 −108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18 −94.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +111%	19 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +90.9%	11 −90.9%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +111%	18−20 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +104%	54 −104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +113%	40 −113%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +114%	35 −114%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +100%	12 −100%