Radeon 630 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1650 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.43
+450%

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon 630 by a whopping 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking282702
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.340.50
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameN18P-G0, N18P-G61Lexa
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$301 $65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Mobile has 7968% better value for money than Radeon 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1380 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate99.8438.98

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Radeon 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.140+
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.43
+450%
Radeon 630 3.35

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon 630 by 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+450%
Radeon 630 1293

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon 630 by 450% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+470%
10−12
−470%
1440p37
+517%
6−7
−517%
4K23
+475%
4−5
−475%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42 no data
Battlefield 5 81 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 41 no data
Far Cry 5 66 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 79 no data
Forza Horizon 4 82 no data
Hitman 3 47 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 104 no data
Metro Exodus 82 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 71 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 79 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 48 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24 no data
Battlefield 5 70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 32 no data
Far Cry 5 53 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 54 no data
Forza Horizon 4 148 no data
Hitman 3 39 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 148 no data
Metro Exodus 61 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 61 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 141 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30 no data
Far Cry 5 40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 62 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 57 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 17 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 48 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 26 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 15 no data
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 26 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 44 no data
Metro Exodus 39
+457%
7−8
−457%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 17 no data
Hitman 3 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+600%
3−4
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 0−1
Far Cry 5 12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 23 no data
Metro Exodus 19 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17 no data

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 470% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 517% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 475% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.43 3.35
Recency 23 April 2019 12 August 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3047 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 31 vote

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.