Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Place in the ranking	301	491
Place by popularity	68	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.54	11.24
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	TU117	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 April 2020 (4 years ago)	3 December 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	640
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1098 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.84	43.92
Floating-point processing power	3.195 TFLOPS	1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.140	+
CUDA	7.5	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.51
+107%

M2000M 8.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+107%

M2000M 3446

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Mobile 13132
+155%

M2000M 5143

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Mobile 31311
+52.2%

M2000M 20567

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Mobile 9313
+124%

M2000M 4157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Mobile 57365
+92.5%

M2000M 29795

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 1650 Mobile 101
+90.9%

M2000M 53

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59 +68.6%	35 −68.6%
1440p	36 +125%	16−18 −125%
4K	23 +91.7%	12 −91.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	38 +124%	16−18 −124%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +206%	16−18 −206%
Elden Ring	47 +88%	24−27 −88%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +128%	27−30 −128%
Counter-Strike 2	33 +94.1%	16−18 −94.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35 +106%	16−18 −106%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +119%	35−40 −119%
Metro Exodus	55 +129%	24−27 −129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +196%	24−27 −196%
Valorant	83 +159%	30−35 −159%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +148%	27−30 −148%
Counter-Strike 2	27 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +64.7%	16−18 −64.7%
Dota 2	72 +260%	20 −260%
Elden Ring	65 +160%	24−27 −160%
Far Cry 5	62 +63.2%	35−40 −63.2%
Fortnite	95−100 +86.8%	50−55 −86.8%
Forza Horizon 4	64 +77.8%	35−40 −77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	59 +96.7%	30 −96.7%
Metro Exodus	40 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	165 +136%	70−75 −136%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +115%	27−30 −115%
Valorant	47 +46.9%	30−35 −46.9%
World of Tanks	130 −1.5%	130−140 +1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	56 +93.1%	27−30 −93.1%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +94.1%	16−18 −94.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Dota 2	89 +178%	30−35 −178%
Far Cry 5	73 +92.1%	35−40 −92.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +81.4%	70−75 −81.4%
Valorant	75−80 +134%	30−35 −134%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +164%	10−12 −164%
Elden Ring	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +164%	10−12 −164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +288%	40−45 −288%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
World of Tanks	120−130 +95.4%	65−70 −95.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	37 +118%	16−18 −118%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +150%	6−7 −150%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +153%	18−20 −153%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +147%	18−20 −147%
Metro Exodus	39 +144%	16−18 −144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Valorant	45−50 +114%	21−24 −114%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Dota 2	30−35 +63.2%	18−20 −63.2%
Elden Ring	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +63.2%	18−20 −63.2%
Metro Exodus	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	47 +80.8%	24−27 −80.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +63.2%	18−20 −63.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	17 +113%	8−9 −113%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
Dota 2	45 +137%	18−20 −137%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Fortnite	23 +156%	9−10 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
Valorant	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and M2000M compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is 69% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Mobile is 125% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Mobile is 92% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 400% faster.
in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M2000M is 2% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
M2000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.51	8.96
Recency	15 April 2020	3 December 2015
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	55 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has a 106.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.