Quadro K510M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	288	908
Place by popularity	59	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	N18P-G0, N18P-G61	GK208
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	192
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	846 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,700 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.84	13.54
Floating-point performance	no data	324.9 gflops
Floating-point performance	3.195 gflops	0.3249 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) and Quadro K510M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	19.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.140	+
CUDA	7.5	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.44
+1011%

Quadro K510M 1.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+1010%

Quadro K510M 641

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 +1060%	5−6 −1060%
1440p	36 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
4K	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

52
+1200%

4−5

−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55 +817%	6−7 −817%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Battlefield 5	81 +1057%	7−8 −1057%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	51 +920%	5−6 −920%
Cyberpunk 2077	41 +925%	4−5 −925%
Far Cry 5	66 +3200%	2−3 −3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	79 +1875%	4−5 −1875%
Forza Horizon 4	166 +3220%	5−6 −3220%
Hitman 3	47 +683%	6−7 −683%
Horizon Zero Dawn	164 +925%	16−18 −925%
Metro Exodus	82 +1071%	7−8 −1071%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +2267%	3−4 −2267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	117 +1200%	9−10 −1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	146 +329%	30−35 −329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80 +1233%	6−7 −1233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +1100%	2−3 −1100%
Battlefield 5	70 +1067%	6−7 −1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +840%	5−6 −840%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +700%	4−5 −700%
Far Cry 5	53 +2550%	2−3 −2550%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 +1250%	4−5 −1250%
Forza Horizon 4	148 +2860%	5−6 −2860%
Hitman 3	42 +600%	6−7 −600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	148 +825%	16−18 −825%
Metro Exodus	68 +1033%	6−7 −1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55 +1733%	3−4 −1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	64 +611%	9−10 −611%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +250%	12−14 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	141 +315%	30−35 −315%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 +400%	6−7 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 +580%	5−6 −580%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +650%	4−5 −650%
Far Cry 5	40 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +1140%	5−6 −1140%
Hitman 3	37 +517%	6−7 −517%
Horizon Zero Dawn	57 +256%	16−18 −256%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55 +511%	9−10 −511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 +200%	12−14 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	17 −100%	30−35 +100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

52
+1633%

3−4

−1633%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	43 +2050%	2−3 −2050%
Far Cry New Dawn	34 +1600%	2−3 −1600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Far Cry 5	25 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Forza Horizon 4	99 +1138%	8−9 −1138%
Hitman 3	26 +271%	7−8 −271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	44 +780%	5−6 −780%
Metro Exodus	39 +1200%	3−4 −1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	115 +1178%	9−10 −1178%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

33
+725%

4−5

−725%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Far Cry New Dawn	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Hitman 3	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Metro Exodus	26 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 +2000%	1−2 −2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12 +500%	2−3 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5	0−1
Far Cry 5	12 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

17
+467%

3−4

−467%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and Quadro K510M compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is 1060% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Mobile is 1100% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Mobile is 1050% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 3220% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro K510M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 50 tests (98%)
Quadro K510M is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.44	1.66
Recency	23 April 2019	23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has a 1010.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K510M, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.