Quadro M3000M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 1650 SUPER
26.17
+82.6%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 83% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking189334
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Value for money27.052.26
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameTU116GM204
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years old)2 October 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$206 $981
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 SUPER has 1097% better value for money than M3000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801,024
Core clock speed1530 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate138.067.20
Floating-point performanceno data2,150 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Quadro M3000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
Display Portno data1.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Multi Monitor+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.55.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.17
+82.6%
M3000M 14.33

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 83% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10143
+82.6%
M3000M 5556

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 83% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 SUPER 64463
+135%
M3000M 27405

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 135% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 SUPER 18218
+120%
M3000M 8289

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 120% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 SUPER 12225
+87%
M3000M 6537

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 87% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 SUPER 68578
+53.8%
M3000M 44603

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 54% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1650 SUPER 55368
+245%
M3000M 16037

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 245% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 1650 SUPER 53879
+223%
M3000M 16677

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 223% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 1650 SUPER 56481
+260%
M3000M 15678

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 260% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 113
+124%
M3000M 50

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 124% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 58
M3000M 85
+45.5%

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 45% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 8
M3000M 52
+519%

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 519% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 55
M3000M 77
+39.5%

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 39% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 40
M3000M 65
+61.2%

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 61% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 30
+34.1%
M3000M 22

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 34% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 55
+37.7%
M3000M 40

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 5
+12.5%
M3000M 5

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro M3000M by 13% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
+20%
60
−20%
1440p36
+100%
18−20
−100%
4K22
−13.6%
25
+13.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
+186%
21−24
−186%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+121%
24−27
−121%
Battlefield 5 72
+46.9%
45−50
−46.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+86.5%
35−40
−86.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+127%
21−24
−127%
Far Cry 5 93
+151%
35−40
−151%
Far Cry New Dawn 89
+128%
35−40
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
Hitman 3 105
+169%
35−40
−169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+147%
30−33
−147%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+196%
24−27
−196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
+183%
30−33
−183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+163%
27−30
−163%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 58
+18.4%
45−50
−18.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+86.5%
35−40
−86.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Far Cry 5 86
+132%
35−40
−132%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+113%
35−40
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
Hitman 3 83
+113%
35−40
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 58
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%
Metro Exodus 51
+132%
21−24
−132%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+123%
30−33
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+114%
42
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+126%
27−30
−126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 57
+16.3%
45−50
−16.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+54.5%
21−24
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 79
+114%
35−40
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 76
+94.9%
35−40
−94.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+127%
22
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Hitman 3 51
+132%
21−24
−132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
+95%
20−22
−95%
Metro Exodus 29
+123%
12−14
−123%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+122%
18−20
−122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Battlefield 5 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+186%
7−8
−186%
Far Cry 5 54
+135%
21−24
−135%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+112%
24−27
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+92.9%
27−30
−92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Hitman 3 25
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5
−100%
10−11
+100%
Metro Exodus 16
+129%
7−8
−129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+129%
14
−129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Battlefield 5 24
+60%
14−16
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 24
+118%
10−12
−118%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+100%
14−16
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+85%
20−22
−85%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+60%
5−6
−60%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and M3000M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 20% faster than M3000M

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 100% faster than M3000M

4K resolution:

  • M3000M is 13.6% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 196% faster than the M3000M.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the M3000M is 100% faster than the GTX 1650 SUPER.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is ahead in 64 tests (94%)
  • M3000M is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.17 14.33
Recency 29 October 2019 2 October 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 75 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4062 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 282 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.