Radeon RX 7600 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Place in the ranking	72	81
Place by popularity	38	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	20.44	78.27
Power efficiency	13.34	16.27
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP102	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	10 March 2017 (7 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7600 XT has 283% better value for money than GTX 1080 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	2048
Core clock speed	1481 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	91 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	354.4	352.6
Floating-point processing power	11.34 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	88	64
TMUs	224	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	204 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	352 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1376 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	484.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Ansel	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 46.67
+7.9%

RX 7600 XT 43.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18582
+7.9%

RX 7600 XT 17219

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	131 +9.2%	120−130 −9.2%
1440p	84 +12%	75−80 −12%
4K	70 +16.7%	60−65 −16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.34 −94.6%	2.74 +94.6%
1440p	8.32 −89.7%	4.39 +89.7%
4K	9.99 −82.1%	5.48 +82.1%

RX 7600 XT has 95% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7600 XT has 90% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7600 XT has 82% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +12.6%	95−100 −12.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +11.6%	95−100 −11.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	82 +9.3%	75−80 −9.3%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +12.6%	95−100 −12.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +11.6%	95−100 −11.6%
Forza Horizon 4	247 +12.3%	220−230 −12.3%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
Metro Exodus	104 +9.5%	95−100 −9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +13.8%	80−85 −13.8%
Valorant	200−210 +11.1%	180−190 −11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	149 +14.6%	130−140 −14.6%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +12.6%	95−100 −12.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +11.6%	95−100 −11.6%
Dota 2	124 +12.7%	110−120 −12.7%
Far Cry 5	86 +14.7%	75−80 −14.7%
Fortnite	190−200 +10%	180−190 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	196 +8.9%	180−190 −8.9%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Metro Exodus	86 +14.7%	75−80 −14.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	229 +9%	210−220 −9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65 +8.3%	60−65 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85 +13.3%	75−80 −13.3%
Valorant	123 +11.8%	110−120 −11.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 +11.6%	250−260 −11.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +13.8%	65−70 −13.8%
Counter-Strike 2	60 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Dota 2	125 +13.6%	110−120 −13.6%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +8%	100−105 −8%
Forza Horizon 4	167 +11.3%	150−160 −11.3%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	109 +9%	100−105 −9%
Valorant	179 +11.9%	160−170 −11.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Dota 2	84 +12%	75−80 −12%
Grand Theft Auto V	84 +12%	75−80 −12%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +9.4%	160−170 −9.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 +17.1%	35−40 −17.1%
World of Tanks	300−350 +10%	280−290 −10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +10.8%	65−70 −10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +8.6%	140−150 −8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	123 +11.8%	110−120 −11.8%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +10.7%	75−80 −10.7%
Metro Exodus	88 +10%	80−85 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Valorant	131 +9.2%	120−130 −9.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Dota 2	98 +8.9%	90−95 −8.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	98 +8.9%	90−95 −8.9%
Metro Exodus	35 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	132 +10%	120−130 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 +8.9%	90−95 −8.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +15.6%	45−50 −15.6%
Counter-Strike 2	8 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Dota 2	125 +13.6%	110−120 −13.6%
Far Cry 5	77 +10%	70−75 −10%
Fortnite	65 +8.3%	60−65 −8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +10.8%	65−70 −10.8%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Valorant	68 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

GTX 1080 Ti is 9% faster in 1080p
GTX 1080 Ti is 12% faster in 1440p
GTX 1080 Ti is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	46.67	43.25
Recency	10 March 2017	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 7.9% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 45.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon RX 7600 XT.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.