Quadro K2100M vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with Quadro K2100M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
48.07
+1270%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms K2100M by a whopping 1270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72733
Place by popularity38not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.360.63
Power efficiency13.274.40
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP102GK106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $84.95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1080 Ti has 3132% better value for money than K2100M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584576
Core clock speed1481 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.432.02
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS0.7684 TFLOPS
ROPs8816
TMUs22448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount11 GB2 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz752 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s48.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.07
+1270%
K2100M 3.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18585
+1269%
K2100M 1358

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Ti 37672
+1474%
K2100M 2394

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Ti 27564
+1616%
K2100M 1606

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 142490
+1104%
K2100M 11835

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 Ti 67675
+1379%
K2100M 4575

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 Ti 85263
+1978%
K2100M 4104

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1080 Ti 55161
+1722%
K2100M 3028

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1080 Ti 175
+880%
K2100M 18

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1080 Ti 68
+114%
K2100M 32

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1080 Ti 10
K2100M 21
+109%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1080 Ti 105
+412%
K2100M 21

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1080 Ti 60
+202%
K2100M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1080 Ti 58
+923%
K2100M 6

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1080 Ti 149
+1308%
K2100M 11

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1080 Ti 149
+1308%
K2100M 11

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1080 Ti 175
+880%
K2100M 18

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 1080 Ti 105
+412%
K2100M 21

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 1080 Ti 68
+114%
K2100M 32

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 1080 Ti 10
K2100M 21
+109%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 1080 Ti 60
+202%
K2100M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 1080 Ti 58
+923%
K2100M 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
+442%
24
−442%
1440p86
+1333%
6−7
−1333%
4K68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.38
−51.9%
3.54
+51.9%
1440p8.13
+74.2%
14.16
−74.2%
4K10.28
+107%
21.24
−107%
  • K2100M has 52% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti has 74% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti has 107% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+1613%
8−9
−1613%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+970%
10−11
−970%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1414%
7−8
−1414%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+1613%
8−9
−1613%
Battlefield 5 166
+1283%
12−14
−1283%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+970%
10−11
−970%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
Far Cry 5 120
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Fortnite 190−200
+961%
18−20
−961%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+819%
16−18
−819%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125
+793%
14−16
−793%
Valorant 250−260
+412%
45−50
−412%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+1613%
8−9
−1613%
Battlefield 5 154
+1183%
12−14
−1183%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+970%
10−11
−970%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+356%
60−65
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
Dota 2 133
+329%
30−35
−329%
Far Cry 5 117
+1363%
8−9
−1363%
Fortnite 203
+1028%
18−20
−1028%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+806%
16−18
−806%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+1100%
10−11
−1100%
Metro Exodus 90
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+721%
14−16
−721%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+1744%
9
−1744%
Valorant 250−260
+412%
45−50
−412%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 149
+1142%
12−14
−1142%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+500%
10−11
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
Dota 2 125
+303%
30−35
−303%
Far Cry 5 109
+1263%
8−9
−1263%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+650%
16−18
−650%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+629%
14−16
−629%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+880%
10−11
−880%
Valorant 179
+265%
45−50
−265%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 163
+806%
18−20
−806%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+1136%
24−27
−1136%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+2700%
3−4
−2700%
Metro Exodus 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+600%
24−27
−600%
Valorant 280−290
+724%
30−35
−724%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+1375%
8−9
−1375%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Far Cry 5 97
+1517%
6−7
−1517%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+1175%
8−9
−1175%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+1875%
4−5
−1875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+1683%
6−7
−1683%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Grand Theft Auto V 98
+513%
16−18
−513%
Metro Exodus 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Valorant 260−270
+1476%
16−18
−1476%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Dota 2 125
+1150%
10−11
−1150%
Far Cry 5 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45
+1025%
4−5
−1025%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 51
+1175%
4−5
−1175%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and K2100M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 442% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 1333% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Ti surpassed K2100M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.07 3.51
Recency 10 March 2017 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 1269.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 450% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

K2100M, on the other hand, has 354.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10599 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 284 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or Quadro K2100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.