GeForce GTX 1660 vs GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GTX 1660, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
48.31
+59.3%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms GTX 1660 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking68188
Place by popularity4440
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.2947.00
Power efficiency13.3317.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 132% better value for money than GTX 1080 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841408
Core clock speed1481 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.4157.1
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs8848
TMUs22488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount11 GB6 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.31
+59.3%
GTX 1660 30.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18574
+59.3%
GTX 1660 11663

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Ti 37672
+78.8%
GTX 1660 21064

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Ti 27564
+94.6%
GTX 1660 14164

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 142490
+74.3%
GTX 1660 81755

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 Ti 67639
+16.8%
GTX 1660 57923

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 394694
GTX 1660 570753
+44.6%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 Ti 85263
+52.1%
GTX 1660 56067

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1080 Ti 55161
GTX 1660 60172
+9.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1080 Ti 175
+45.4%
GTX 1660 120

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1080 Ti 68
+36.9%
GTX 1660 49

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1080 Ti 10
+16.3%
GTX 1660 9

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1080 Ti 105
+76.3%
GTX 1660 60

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1080 Ti 60
+48.8%
GTX 1660 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1080 Ti 58
+115%
GTX 1660 27

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1080 Ti 149
+136%
GTX 1660 63

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

GTX 1080 Ti 148
+10.2%
GTX 1660 134

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD131
+56%
84
−56%
1440p83
+62.7%
51
−62.7%
4K70
+159%
27
−159%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.34
−105%
2.61
+105%
1440p8.42
−96.1%
4.29
+96.1%
4K9.99
−23.1%
8.11
+23.1%
  • GTX 1660 has 105% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 has 96% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 has 23% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+48.6%
72
−48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+49.3%
71
−49.3%
Elden Ring 170−180
+108%
84
−108%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 82
−8.5%
85−90
+8.5%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+91.1%
56
−91.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+92.7%
55
−92.7%
Forza Horizon 4 247
+87.1%
132
−87.1%
Metro Exodus 104
+9.5%
95
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−23.1%
112
+23.1%
Valorant 200−210
+44.9%
138
−44.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 149
+67.4%
85−90
−67.4%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+123%
48
−123%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+136%
45
−136%
Dota 2 124
−21%
150
+21%
Elden Ring 170−180
+94.4%
90
−94.4%
Far Cry 5 86
−68.6%
145
+68.6%
Fortnite 190−200
+37.5%
140−150
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+78.2%
110
−78.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+4.3%
115
−4.3%
Metro Exodus 86
+30.3%
66
−30.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 229
+6%
216
−6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+62.5%
40
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
−20%
100−110
+20%
Valorant 123
+89.2%
65
−89.2%
World of Tanks 270−280
+1.8%
270−280
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
−20.3%
85−90
+20.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+39.5%
43
−39.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−35.7%
38
+35.7%
Dota 2 125
−57.6%
197
+57.6%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+25.9%
85−90
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+75.8%
95
−75.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
−62.4%
170−180
+62.4%
Valorant 179
+55.7%
115
−55.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 84
+61.5%
52
−61.5%
Elden Ring 100−110
+128%
47
−128%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+61.5%
52
−61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+35.7%
129
−35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+64%
25
−64%
World of Tanks 300−350
+56.6%
190−200
−56.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+20%
60−65
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 37
+42.3%
26
−42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−27.8%
23
+27.8%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+61.7%
90−95
−61.7%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+83.6%
67
−83.6%
Metro Exodus 88
+49.2%
59
−49.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+91.7%
45−50
−91.7%
Valorant 131
+81.9%
72
−81.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+231%
16
−231%
Dota 2 98
+100%
49
−100%
Elden Ring 50−55
+152%
21
−152%
Grand Theft Auto V 98
+100%
49
−100%
Metro Exodus 35
+75%
20
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 132
+63%
81
−63%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+100%
49
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+82.8%
27−30
−82.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−25%
10
+25%
Dota 2 125
+43.7%
87
−43.7%
Far Cry 5 77
+83.3%
40−45
−83.3%
Fortnite 65
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+100%
36
−100%
Valorant 68
+78.9%
38
−78.9%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 56% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 63% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 159% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 231% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 is 69% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
  • GTX 1660 is ahead in 11 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.31 30.33
Recency 10 March 2017 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 59.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 83.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10339 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5465 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.