GeForce GT 220 vs GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GT 220, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
41.60
+8390%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 8390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking751231
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.14no data
Power efficiency13.160.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP102GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 March 2017 (8 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1080 Ti and GT 220 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358448
Core clock speed1481 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °C105 °C
Texture fill rate354.49.840
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS0.1277 TFLOPS
ROPs888
TMUs22416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount11 GB1 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s25.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortVGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor support++
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.53.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Ti 41.60
+8390%
GT 220 0.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18586
+8387%
GT 220 219

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129
+514%
21
−514%
1440p840−1
4K670−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.42
−42.3%
3.81
+42.3%
1440p8.32no data
4K10.43no data
  • GT 220 has 42% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+12250%
2−3
−12250%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 166
+16500%
1−2
−16500%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+12250%
2−3
−12250%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Far Cry 5 120
+11900%
1−2
−11900%
Fortnite 190−200
+9450%
2−3
−9450%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+3575%
4−5
−3575%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+13600%
1−2
−13600%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125
+1463%
8−9
−1463%
Valorant 250−260
+796%
27−30
−796%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 154
+15300%
1−2
−15300%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+12250%
2−3
−12250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1535%
16−18
−1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Dota 2 133
+1109%
10−12
−1109%
Far Cry 5 117
+11600%
1−2
−11600%
Fortnite 203
+10050%
2−3
−10050%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+3525%
4−5
−3525%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+13600%
1−2
−13600%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+11900%
1−2
−11900%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Metro Exodus 90 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+3260%
5−6
−3260%
Valorant 250−260
+796%
27−30
−796%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 149
+14800%
1−2
−14800%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Dota 2 125
+1036%
10−12
−1036%
Far Cry 5 109
+10800%
1−2
−10800%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+2900%
4−5
−2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+1175%
8−9
−1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+1860%
5−6
−1860%
Valorant 179
+539%
27−30
−539%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 163
+16200%
1−2
−16200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+12000%
1−2
−12000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+15450%
2−3
−15450%
Grand Theft Auto V 84 0−1
Metro Exodus 56 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+3400%
5−6
−3400%
Valorant 280−290
+9233%
3−4
−9233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+11700%
1−2
−11700%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 0−1
Far Cry 5 97
+3133%
3−4
−3133%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+4500%
2−3
−4500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+10600%
1−2
−10600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 98
+553%
14−16
−553%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 0−1
Valorant 260−270
+8867%
3−4
−8867%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Dota 2 125
+12400%
1−2
−12400%
Far Cry 5 55
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Forza Horizon 4 75 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and GT 220 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 514% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 15450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Ti surpassed GT 220 in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.60 0.49
Recency 10 March 2017 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 58 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 8389.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1000% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GT 220, on the other hand, has 331% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10926 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 819 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or GeForce GT 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.