TITAN V vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy TITAN V
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with TITAN V, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
34.62

TITAN V outperforms GTX 1080 SLI Mobile by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 SLI
TITAN V TITAN V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.07
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)7 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51205120
Core clock speed1556 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data465.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.9 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz848 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data651.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan++
CUDA+7.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
−16.8%
160−170
+16.8%
1440p120−130
−26.7%
152
+26.7%
4K95
+15.9%
82
−15.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data18.74
1440pno data19.73
4Kno data36.57

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−15.6%
230−240
+15.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−18.8%
95−100
+18.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−15.6%
230−240
+15.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−18.8%
95−100
+18.8%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Fortnite 150−160
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−18.5%
160−170
+18.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−15.1%
160−170
+15.1%
Valorant 200−210
−14.8%
240−250
+14.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−15.6%
230−240
+15.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−8.3%
300−310
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−18.8%
95−100
+18.8%
Dota 2 140−150
−14.3%
160−170
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Fortnite 150−160
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−18.5%
160−170
+18.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−17.3%
95−100
+17.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−15.1%
160−170
+15.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
−16%
210−220
+16%
Valorant 200−210
−14.8%
240−250
+14.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−18.8%
95−100
+18.8%
Dota 2 140−150
−14.3%
160−170
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−18.5%
160−170
+18.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−15.1%
160−170
+15.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
−13%
130−140
+13%
Valorant 200−210
−14.8%
240−250
+14.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−16.7%
280−290
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−15.9%
80−85
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−14.3%
200−210
+14.3%
Valorant 240−250
−15.2%
280−290
+15.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−16.4%
85−90
+16.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Valorant 210−220
−18.5%
250−260
+18.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Dota 2 100−110
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and TITAN V compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 17% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 27% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.62 41.25
Recency 16 August 2016 7 December 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm

TITAN V has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while TITAN V is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI
NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics AMD HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
vs
GTX 260M 260M
7800 GS AGP GeForce 7800 GS AGP
vs
ATI HD 3650 3650
RX 6700M AMD RX 6700M
vs
GT 630 630
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling AMD RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
vs
GTX 645 OEM 645 OEM
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh NVIDIA GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
vs
ATI Mobility X1700 Radeon X1700
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
R9 290 290
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
vs
GT 440 440
RTX 3060 Max-Q NVIDIA RTX 3060 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX
vs
R7 370 370
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
vs
GTX 775M Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.6 3238 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 3321 vote

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile or TITAN V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.