GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
37.41
+34.8%

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127204
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.11
Power efficiencyno data27.29
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202304
Core clock speed1556 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data72
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
+36%
100−110
−36%
4K96
+37.1%
70−75
−37.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.79
4Kno data2.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+40%
55−60
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Elden Ring 130−140
+36.8%
95−100
−36.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+40%
55−60
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+37.7%
130−140
−37.7%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+40%
65−70
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
Valorant 140−150
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+40%
55−60
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Dota 2 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%
Elden Ring 130−140
+36.8%
95−100
−36.8%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Fortnite 160−170
+38.3%
120−130
−38.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+37.7%
130−140
−37.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+40%
65−70
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 116
+36.5%
85−90
−36.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 169
+40.8%
120−130
−40.8%
Valorant 140−150
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%
World of Tanks 270−280
+39.5%
200−210
−39.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+40%
55−60
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Dota 2 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+37.7%
130−140
−37.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 83
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Valorant 140−150
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Elden Ring 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
World of Tanks 230−240
+40%
170−180
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+40%
50−55
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+41.2%
85−90
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+42.7%
75−80
−42.7%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Valorant 110−120
+35.3%
85−90
−35.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Dota 2 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Elden Ring 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169
+40.8%
120−130
−40.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Fortnite 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Valorant 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 36% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 37% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.41 27.75
Recency 16 August 2016 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile has a 34.8% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3062 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1416 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.