Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
36.23
+75.4%

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms Pro 5600M by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking103249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.78
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLINavi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1443 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data164.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.274 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+84%
75−80
−84%
4K78
+95%
40−45
−95%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+93.4%
60−65
−93.4%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+69.2%
130−140
−69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+85.7%
45−50
−85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+93.4%
60−65
−93.4%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+47.8%
90−95
−47.8%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+69.2%
130−140
−69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+85.7%
45−50
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%
Fortnite 160−170
+49.6%
110−120
−49.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+66.7%
90−95
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+68.1%
70−75
−68.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+75.9%
85−90
−75.9%
Valorant 220−230
+43.7%
150−160
−43.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+93.4%
60−65
−93.4%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+47.8%
90−95
−47.8%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+69.2%
130−140
−69.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+11.6%
240−250
−11.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+85.7%
45−50
−85.7%
Dota 2 140−150
+22%
110−120
−22%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%
Fortnite 160−170
+49.6%
110−120
−49.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+66.7%
90−95
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+68.1%
70−75
−68.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+55.4%
80−85
−55.4%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+89.8%
45−50
−89.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+17.2%
85−90
−17.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+151%
65−70
−151%
Valorant 220−230
+43.7%
150−160
−43.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+47.8%
90−95
−47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+85.7%
45−50
−85.7%
Dota 2 140−150
+22%
110−120
−22%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+66.7%
90−95
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+6.9%
85−90
−6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Valorant 220−230
+43.7%
150−160
−43.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+49.6%
110−120
−49.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+106%
45−50
−106%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+68.1%
160−170
−68.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Valorant 250−260
+31%
190−200
−31%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+57.1%
60−65
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+84.3%
50−55
−84.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+93.1%
55−60
−93.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+94.7%
35−40
−94.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+94.3%
50−55
−94.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+102%
40−45
−102%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+89.5%
18−20
−89.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+112%
30−35
−112%
Valorant 230−240
+82.3%
130−140
−82.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+82.4%
30−35
−82.4%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Dota 2 110−120
+48%
75−80
−48%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 37
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 84% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 95% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 151% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 SLI Mobile surpassed Pro 5600M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.23 20.66
Recency 16 August 2016 15 June 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 75.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 104 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.