GeForce 8400M G vs GTX 1080 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and GeForce 8400M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
34.77
+12778%

GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms 8400M G by a whopping 12778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1431356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.00no data
Power efficiency16.281.90
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP104G86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608
Core clock speed1607 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt10 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.43.200
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1608

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s400 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1160−1
1440p730−1
4K56-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.31no data
1440p6.85no data
4K8.93no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+929%
7−8
−929%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Battlefield 5 115 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+929%
7−8
−929%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Far Cry 5 91 0−1
Fortnite 143
+14200%
1−2
−14200%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+3500%
3−4
−3500%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1786%
7−8
−1786%
Valorant 188
+623%
24−27
−623%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Battlefield 5 112 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+929%
7−8
−929%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2208%
12−14
−2208%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Dota 2 130−140
+1433%
9−10
−1433%
Far Cry 5 117 0−1
Fortnite 201
+20000%
1−2
−20000%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+3433%
3−4
−3433%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 119 0−1
Metro Exodus 73 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+1543%
7−8
−1543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+3450%
4−5
−3450%
Valorant 186
+615%
24−27
−615%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+929%
7−8
−929%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Dota 2 120
+1233%
9−10
−1233%
Far Cry 5 108 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 102
+3300%
3−4
−3300%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+1750%
4−5
−1750%
Valorant 137
+427%
24−27
−427%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150
+14900%
1−2
−14900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+22600%
1−2
−22600%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 0−1
Metro Exodus 44 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17400%
1−2
−17400%
Valorant 183
+18200%
1−2
−18200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 86 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 74 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 87
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 88 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+407%
14−16
−407%
Metro Exodus 27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 0−1
Valorant 178
+8800%
2−3
−8800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Forza Horizon 4 61 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Mobile surpassed 8400M G in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.77 0.27
Recency 15 August 2016 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 10 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 12777.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

8400M G, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 337 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile or GeForce 8400M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.