NVS 310 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Place in the ranking	202	1184
Place by popularity	9	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.99	0.01
Power efficiency	15.38	2.26
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP106	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2016 (8 years ago)	26 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 6 GB has 169800% better value for money than NVS 310.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	48
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	523 MHz
Boost clock speed	1709 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	136.7	4.184
Floating-point processing power	4.375 TFLOPS	0.1004 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	80	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	250 mm	156 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	14 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 6 GB 26.57
+3988%

NVS 310 0.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1060 6 GB 10252
+4017%

NVS 310 249

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	87 +4250%	2−3 −4250%
1440p	45 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
4K	31	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+4300%

1−2

−4300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	72 +7100%	1−2 −7100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
Battlefield 5	89 +4350%	2−3 −4350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 +6500%	1−2 −6500%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Far Cry 5	83 +4050%	2−3 −4050%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +4000%	2−3 −4000%
Forza Horizon 4	279 +4550%	6−7 −4550%
Hitman 3	50−55 +5300%	1−2 −5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +5950%	2−3 −5950%
Metro Exodus	92 +4500%	2−3 −4500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +4900%	2−3 −4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	135 +4400%	3−4 −4400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +5250%	2−3 −5250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	93 +4550%	2−3 −4550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
Battlefield 5	78 +7700%	1−2 −7700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60 +5900%	1−2 −5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Far Cry 5	64 +6300%	1−2 −6300%
Far Cry New Dawn	64 +6300%	1−2 −6300%
Forza Horizon 4	260 +4233%	6−7 −4233%
Hitman 3	50−55 +5300%	1−2 −5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +5950%	2−3 −5950%
Metro Exodus	78 +7700%	1−2 −7700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	69 +6800%	1−2 −6800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +4450%	2−3 −4450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	183 +4475%	4−5 −4475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +5250%	2−3 −5250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	38	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	43 +4200%	1−2 −4200%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Far Cry 5	50 +4900%	1−2 −4900%
Forza Horizon 4	73 +7200%	1−2 −7200%
Hitman 3	50−55 +5300%	1−2 −5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +5950%	2−3 −5950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +4450%	2−3 −4450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +5250%	2−3 −5250%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

69
+6800%

1−2

−6800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	48 +4700%	1−2 −4700%
Far Cry New Dawn	43 +4200%	1−2 −4200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	32	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1
Far Cry 5	31	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	196 +4800%	4−5 −4800%
Hitman 3	30−35	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +5400%	1−2 −5400%
Metro Exodus	50 +4900%	1−2 −4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +5800%	1−2 −5800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +4833%	3−4 −4833%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

46
+4500%

1−2

−4500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	22	0−1
Hitman 3	21−24	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +4400%	3−4 −4400%
Metro Exodus	25	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	0−1
Far Cry 5	15	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	38	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

This is how GTX 1060 6 GB and NVS 310 compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 6 GB is 4250% faster in 1080p
GTX 1060 6 GB is 4400% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.57	0.65
Recency	19 July 2016	26 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	20 Watt

GTX 1060 6 GB has a 3987.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 310, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 310 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is a desktop card while NVS 310 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.