GeForce GTX 775M vs 1060 3 GB

Place in performance ranking	202	442
Place by popularity	27	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.31	1.72
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GP106	N13E-GTX-A2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 August 2016 (7 years ago)	24 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$1112 (5.6x MSRP)	$780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 3 GB has 34% better value for money than GTX 775M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	1344
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	719 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.0	no data
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and GeForce GTX 775M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	250 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	no data	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	no data
CUDA	6.1	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 3 GB 24.83
+167%

GTX 775M 9.30

1060 3 GB outperforms 775M by 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 3 GB 9588
+167%

GTX 775M 3593

1060 3 GB outperforms 775M by 167% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

+180%

5−6
−180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Hitman 3	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +186%	14−16 −186%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Hitman 3	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +186%	14−16 −186%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +186%	14−16 −186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+189%

9−10
−189%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Hitman 3	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+200%

5−6
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Hitman 3	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.83	9.30
Recency	18 August 2016	24 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	100 Watt