FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050

Place in performance ranking	359	358
Place by popularity	19	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.01	4.32
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	N17P-G1	Tahiti
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 October 2016 (7 years ago)	24 August 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$2,499
Current price	$211 (1.9x MSRP)	$433 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro S9000 has 8% better value for money than GTX 1050.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1792
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	350 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	58.20	100.8
Floating-point performance	1,862 gflops	3,226 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	267 mm
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Form factor	no data	full height / full length
Recommended system power (PSU)	300 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
SLI options	-	no data
SLI	-	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	264 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data
DisplayPort count	no data	1
Dual-link DVI support	no data	1

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.04

FirePro S9000 13.07
+0.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 5048

FirePro S9000 5059
+0.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 +0%	45−50 +0%
1440p	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
4K	22 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

20−22
+11.1%

18−20

−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Battlefield 5	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +0%	27−30 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	26 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Battlefield 5	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	49 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	17 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	15 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Battlefield 5	36 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Hitman 3	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Battlefield 5	27 +0%	27−30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

This is how GTX 1050 and FirePro S9000 compete in popular games:

FirePro S9000 is 0% faster than GTX 1050 in 1080p
FirePro S9000 is 0% faster than GTX 1050 in 1440p
GTX 1050 is 4.8% faster than FirePro S9000 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.04	13.07
Recency	25 October 2016	24 August 2012
Cost	$109	$2499
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	350 Watt