FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1070
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 with FirePro S9000, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1070 outperforms S9000 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 430 |
| Place by popularity | 40 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 20.29 | 0.43 |
| Power efficiency | 16.38 | 4.09 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 24 August 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $2,499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
GTX 1070 has 4619% better value for money than FirePro S9000.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 202.0 | 100.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.463 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 120 | 112 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
| DisplayPort count | no data | 1 |
| Dual-link DVI support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | no data |
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Ansel | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 117
+193%
| 40−45
−193%
|
| 1440p | 69
+188%
| 24−27
−188%
|
| 4K | 49
+172%
| 18−20
−172%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 3.24
+1829%
| 62.48
−1829%
|
| 1440p | 5.49
+1796%
| 104.13
−1796%
|
| 4K | 7.73
+1695%
| 138.83
−1695%
|
- GTX 1070 has 1829% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- GTX 1070 has 1796% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- GTX 1070 has 1695% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+182%
|
65−70
−182%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+174%
|
27−30
−174%
|
| God of War | 75−80
+178%
|
27−30
−178%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 141
+182%
|
50−55
−182%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+182%
|
65−70
−182%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+174%
|
27−30
−174%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 106
+203%
|
35−40
−203%
|
| Fortnite | 256
+169%
|
95−100
−169%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 129
+187%
|
45−50
−187%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+194%
|
35−40
−194%
|
| God of War | 75−80
+178%
|
27−30
−178%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 135
+170%
|
50−55
−170%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+168%
|
75−80
−168%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 119
+198%
|
40−45
−198%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+182%
|
65−70
−182%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+177%
|
100−105
−177%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+174%
|
27−30
−174%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+176%
|
50−55
−176%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100
+186%
|
35−40
−186%
|
| Fortnite | 175
+169%
|
65−70
−169%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 121
+169%
|
45−50
−169%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+194%
|
35−40
−194%
|
| God of War | 75−80
+178%
|
27−30
−178%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 111
+178%
|
40−45
−178%
|
| Metro Exodus | 62
+195%
|
21−24
−195%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 122
+171%
|
45−50
−171%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 120
+200%
|
40−45
−200%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+168%
|
75−80
−168%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 107
+168%
|
40−45
−168%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+174%
|
27−30
−174%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+176%
|
50−55
−176%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90
+200%
|
30−33
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 94
+169%
|
35−40
−169%
|
| God of War | 75−80
+178%
|
27−30
−178%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 81
+170%
|
30−33
−170%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 63
+200%
|
21−24
−200%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+168%
|
75−80
−168%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 127
+182%
|
45−50
−182%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80
+185%
|
27−30
−185%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+168%
|
85−90
−168%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
+205%
|
21−24
−205%
|
| Metro Exodus | 38
+171%
|
14−16
−171%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+169%
|
65−70
−169%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+178%
|
85−90
−178%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 84
+180%
|
30−33
−180%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 68
+183%
|
24−27
−183%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 79
+193%
|
27−30
−193%
|
| God of War | 40−45
+193%
|
14−16
−193%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+176%
|
21−24
−176%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 79
+193%
|
27−30
−193%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 62
+195%
|
21−24
−195%
|
| Metro Exodus | 23
+188%
|
8−9
−188%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 43
+169%
|
16−18
−169%
|
| Valorant | 190−200
+183%
|
70−75
−183%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45
+181%
|
16−18
−181%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+220%
|
5−6
−220%
|
| Dota 2 | 95−100
+183%
|
35−40
−183%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 52
+189%
|
18−20
−189%
|
| God of War | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 39
+179%
|
14−16
−179%
|
This is how GTX 1070 and FirePro S9000 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1070 is 193% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1070 is 188% faster in 1440p
- GTX 1070 is 172% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.22 | 12.07 |
| Recency | 10 June 2016 | 24 August 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
GTX 1070 has a 166.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1070 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9000 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
