AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 1050 Mobile
11.51

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile by 502% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking37818
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Value for money11.9518.51
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGP107BNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years old)8 December 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$256 $957 (1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 55% better value for money than GTX 1050 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6405120
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1354 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.72720.0

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and Radeon RX 6900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options-no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMIno data+
HDCP2.2no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.51
RX 6900 XT 69.29
+502%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile by 502% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Mobile 4461
RX 6900 XT 26859
+502%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile by 502% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
RX 6900 XT 59119
+668%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile by 668% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1050 Mobile 6068
RX 6900 XT 50587
+734%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile by 734% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
−448%
400−450
+448%
Full HD46
−320%
193
+320%
1440p24
−458%
134
+458%
4K15
−453%
83
+453%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−216%
117
+216%
Battlefield 5 51
−282%
195
+282%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
−333%
170−180
+333%
Far Cry 5 39
−303%
150−160
+303%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−232%
126
+232%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−415%
283
+415%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−626%
196
+626%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−573%
222
+573%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
−253%
106
+253%
Battlefield 5 44
−345%
196
+345%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−424%
170−180
+424%
Far Cry 5 36
−336%
150−160
+336%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
−232%
123
+232%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−437%
279
+437%
Metro Exodus 19
−763%
164
+763%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−786%
124
+786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−614%
207
+614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−728%
323
+728%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−444%
98
+444%
Battlefield 5 37
−432%
197
+432%
Far Cry 5 33
−376%
150−160
+376%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
−258%
118
+258%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−570%
248
+570%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−645%
164
+645%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−600%
120−130
+600%
Metro Exodus 11
−827%
102
+827%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−925%
82
+925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−835%
159
+835%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−662%
99
+662%
Battlefield 5 26
−654%
196
+654%
Far Cry 5 21
−533%
130−140
+533%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
−388%
117
+388%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−788%
231
+788%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
−680%
75−80
+680%
Metro Exodus 7
−857%
67
+857%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−817%
55
+817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−963%
85
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1120%
122
+1120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−871%
68
+871%
Battlefield 5 13
−931%
134
+931%
Far Cry 5 11
−645%
80−85
+645%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
−818%
101
+818%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−980%
162
+980%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 448% faster than GTX 1050 Mobile

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 320% faster than GTX 1050 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 458% faster than GTX 1050 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 453% faster than GTX 1050 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 1120% faster than the GTX 1050 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed GTX 1050 Mobile in all 43 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 11.51 69.29
Recency 3 January 2017 8 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1048 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3332 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.