Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and Radeon R9 M385X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.64
+125%

GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms R9 M385X by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking409618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.82no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGP107BStrato
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed1354 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.7261.60
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Eyefinity-+
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.64
+125%
R9 M385X 5.17

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
+39.5%
R9 M385X 5515

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Mobile 26560
+113%
R9 M385X 12453

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Mobile 6068
+78.2%
R9 M385X 3405

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 38042
+68.7%
R9 M385X 22544

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+143%
30−35
−143%
Full HD46
+70.4%
27
−70.4%
1440p24
+140%
10−12
−140%
4K15
+150%
6−7
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Battlefield 5 51
+292%
12−14
−292%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+264%
10−12
−264%
Far Cry 5 39
+255%
10−12
−255%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+171%
14−16
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+66.7%
30−35
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Battlefield 5 44
+238%
12−14
−238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+200%
10−12
−200%
Far Cry 5 36
+227%
10−12
−227%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Metro Exodus 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−5.1%
41
+5.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Far Cry 5 33
+200%
10−12
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Metro Exodus 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+143%
7−8
−143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Battlefield 5 26
+160%
10−11
−160%
Far Cry 5 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+117%
12−14
−117%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Metro Exodus 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+275%
4−5
−275%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and R9 M385X compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 143% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 70% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 140% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 900% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M385X is 5% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (41%)
  • R9 M385X is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 5.17
Recency 3 January 2017 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 125.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R9 M385X, on the other hand, has a 2.4% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M385X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Radeon R9 M385X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1224 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M385X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.