Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	383	470
Place by popularity	86	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.18	1.73
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	GP107B	Polaris 21
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$256	$894

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Mobile has 546% better value for money than Pro 555X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	768
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	59.72	43.54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and Radeon Pro 555X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	-	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	81.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	no data	+
GameStream	+	no data
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.55
+37.8%

Pro 555X 8.38

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Mobile 4461
+37.9%

Pro 555X 3235

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by 38% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	73 +46%	50−55 −46%
Full HD	46 +53.3%	30−35 −53.3%
1440p	24 +50%	16−18 −50%
4K	15 +50%	10−12 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37	no data
Battlefield 5	51	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40	no data
Far Cry 5	39	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	38	no data
Forza Horizon 4	55	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	27	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30	no data
Battlefield 5	44	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33	no data
Far Cry 5	36	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	37	no data
Forza Horizon 4	52	no data
Metro Exodus	19	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	29	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18	no data
Battlefield 5	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Far Cry 5	33	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	37	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22	no data

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
Metro Exodus	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	13	no data
Battlefield 5	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	21	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +50%	16−18 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	26	no data

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Metro Exodus	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7	no data
Battlefield 5	13 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	11	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	15	no data

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

+44.4%

9−10
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Hitman 3	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Hitman 3	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+43.8%

16−18

−43.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+40%

10−11

−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%