RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.19

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking45222
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiency10.648.48
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP107BGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64024064
Core clock speed1354 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt600 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.721,968
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs40752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
−516%
450−500
+516%
Full HD46
−530%
290−300
+530%
1440p24
−525%
150−160
+525%
4K15
−533%
95−100
+533%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data29.53
1440pno data57.10
4Kno data90.16

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 51
−488%
300−310
+488%
Far Cry 5 39
−515%
240−250
+515%
Fortnite 132
−506%
800−850
+506%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−536%
350−400
+536%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
−530%
290−300
+530%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
−536%
280−290
+536%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−529%
1000−1050
+529%
Dota 2 126
−535%
800−850
+535%
Far Cry 5 36
−511%
220−230
+511%
Fortnite 51
−488%
300−310
+488%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−477%
300−310
+477%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
−519%
260−270
+519%
Metro Exodus 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
−534%
260−270
+534%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−515%
240−250
+515%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
−522%
230−240
+522%
Dota 2 115
−509%
700−750
+509%
Far Cry 5 33
−536%
210−220
+536%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−522%
230−240
+522%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
−521%
180−190
+521%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−536%
140−150
+536%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
−515%
240−250
+515%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−510%
500−550
+510%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Metro Exodus 11
−536%
70−75
+536%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
−515%
160−170
+515%
Far Cry 5 21
−519%
130−140
+519%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−515%
160−170
+515%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
−500%
150−160
+500%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−536%
140−150
+536%
Metro Exodus 7
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 13
−515%
80−85
+515%
Dota 2 34
−518%
210−220
+518%
Far Cry 5 11
−536%
70−75
+536%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−533%
95−100
+533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−525%
75−80
+525%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
−500%
60−65
+500%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 516% faster in 900p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 530% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 525% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 533% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.19 71.35
Recency 3 January 2017 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 600 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 537.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 2357.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1391 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.