Radeon R9 M390 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Radeon R9 M390, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.35
+70%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms R9 M390 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking340468
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.06no data
Power efficiency15.04no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameGP107Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)9 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed1291 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82no data
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.35
+70%
R9 M390 9.62

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
+38.6%
R9 M390 6819

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+18.6%
43
−18.6%
1440p31
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
4K25
+25%
20
−25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.73no data
1440p4.48no data
4K5.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Battlefield 5 63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Fortnite 85−90
+59.3%
50−55
−59.3%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55
+71.9%
30−35
−71.9%
Valorant 120−130
+42%
85−90
−42%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Battlefield 5 52
+30%
40−45
−30%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+46%
130−140
−46%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Dota 2 141
+114%
65−70
−114%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Fortnite 65
+20.4%
50−55
−20.4%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+60%
40−45
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+88.2%
34
−88.2%
Metro Exodus 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+58.1%
31
−58.1%
Valorant 120−130
+42%
85−90
−42%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Dota 2 125
+89.4%
65−70
−89.4%
Far Cry 5 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+12.5%
30−35
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+44.4%
18
−44.4%
Valorant 53
−66%
85−90
+66%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
−20%
50−55
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+65.2%
65−70
−65.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+123%
12−14
−123%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+226%
45−50
−226%
Valorant 150−160
+52.9%
100−110
−52.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+40%
20−22
−40%
Metro Exodus 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12
−75%
Valorant 85−90
+80.9%
45−50
−80.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 63
+90.9%
30−35
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and R9 M390 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 19% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 72% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 226% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M390 is 66% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • R9 M390 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.35 9.62
Recency 25 October 2016 9 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

GTX 1050 Ti has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 207871 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or Radeon R9 M390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.