GeForce GTX 775M vs 1050 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with GeForce GTX 775M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.36
+75.5%

1050 Ti outperforms 775M by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking309441
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.891.73
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN17P-G1N13E-GTX-A2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (7 years ago)24 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data
Current price$207 (1.5x MSRP)$780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti has 240% better value for money than GTX 775M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681344
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1291 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82no data
Floating-point performance2,138 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 775M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.36
+75.5%
GTX 775M 9.32

1050 Ti outperforms 775M by 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti 6317
+75.5%
GTX 775M 3600

1050 Ti outperforms 775M by 75% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
+55.7%
GTX 775M 6071

1050 Ti outperforms 775M by 56% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1050 Ti 20164
+68%
GTX 775M 12002

1050 Ti outperforms 775M by 68% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+76.7%
30−35
−76.7%
1440p30
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
4K27
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 53 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 69 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 56 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 44 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 41 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 29 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 32 no data
Metro Exodus 29 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18 no data
Metro Exodus 14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 775M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 77% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 88% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 93% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.36 9.32
Recency 25 October 2016 24 September 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 204567 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.