Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Arc A750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.44

Arc A750 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332178
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.1057.09
Power efficiency15.129.72
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP107DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 305% better value for money than GTX 1050 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed1291 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82537.6
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs48224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.44
Arc A750 31.71
+92.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6321
Arc A750 12193
+92.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
Arc A750 37288
+294%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
Arc A750 29667
+296%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti 50939
Arc A750 130715
+157%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti 352876
Arc A750 634482
+79.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−122%
109
+122%
1440p30
−96.7%
59
+96.7%
4K26
−38.5%
36
+38.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.84
−7%
2.65
+7%
1440p4.63
+5.7%
4.90
−5.7%
4K5.35
+50.2%
8.03
−50.2%
  • Arc A750 has 7% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 6% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 50% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−214%
91
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Elden Ring 50−55
−64.7%
84
+64.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−71.7%
90−95
+71.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−203%
88
+203%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 67
−325%
285
+325%
Metro Exodus 48
−142%
116
+142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Valorant 63
−100%
120−130
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−93.6%
90−95
+93.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−162%
76
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Dota 2 90
−10%
99
+10%
Elden Ring 50−55
−112%
100−110
+112%
Far Cry 5 77
+13.2%
68
−13.2%
Fortnite 90−95
−64.4%
140−150
+64.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−378%
239
+378%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
−54.7%
99
+54.7%
Metro Exodus 32
−194%
94
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−596%
180−190
+596%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−261%
65−70
+261%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−435%
100−110
+435%
Valorant 34
−271%
120−130
+271%
World of Tanks 200−210
−34%
270−280
+34%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−133%
90−95
+133%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−159%
75
+159%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Dota 2 125
−92%
240−250
+92%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−47.5%
85−90
+47.5%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−363%
199
+363%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−56%
180−190
+56%
Valorant 53
−138%
120−130
+138%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 29
−41.4%
41
+41.4%
Elden Ring 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−41.4%
41
+41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−14.4%
170−180
+14.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
World of Tanks 110−120
−78.9%
200−210
+78.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−87.9%
60−65
+87.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−286%
54
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−141%
95−100
+141%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−383%
145
+383%
Metro Exodus 29
−197%
86
+197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−171%
57
+171%
Valorant 39
−136%
90−95
+136%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−66.7%
20
+66.7%
Dota 2 28
−60.7%
45
+60.7%
Elden Ring 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
−60.7%
45
+60.7%
Metro Exodus 9
−378%
43
+378%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 31
−219%
95−100
+219%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−60.7%
45
+60.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Dota 2 63
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−110%
40−45
+110%
Fortnite 18−20
−121%
40−45
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−394%
84
+394%
Valorant 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 122% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 97% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 13% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 596% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A750 is ahead in 54 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.44 31.71
Recency 25 October 2016 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has 200% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 92.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 207401 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 868 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.