Radeon RX 7600M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	398	406
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	3.53	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	N17P-G0 Max-Q	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$1085	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1792
Core clock speed	999 - 1189 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1139 - 1328 MHz	2070 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	34 - 40 Watt	90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	53.12	246.4
Floating-point performance	1,700 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.44
+2.6%

RX 7600M 10.18

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 7600M by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4041
+2.6%

RX 7600M 3940

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 7600M by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	47 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
1440p	22 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
4K	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Battlefield 5	46 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	37 +42.3%	24−27 −42.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Hitman 3	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Battlefield 5	40 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27 +0%	27−30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	34 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Hitman 3	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	19 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Battlefield 5	37 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	31 +19.2%	24−27 −19.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	34 +25.9%	27−30 −25.9%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	17 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	11 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 +0%	10−11 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Hitman 3	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6 +0%	6−7 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	11 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	12 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 Max-Q is 4.4% faster than RX 7600M in 1080p
GTX 1050 Max-Q is 4.8% faster than RX 7600M in 1440p
GTX 1050 Max-Q is 16.7% faster than RX 7600M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Max-Q is 76.2% faster than the RX 7600M.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M is 31.3% faster than the GTX 1050 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Max-Q is ahead in 41 test (60%)
RX 7600M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
there's a draw in 25 tests (37%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	10.44	10.18
Recency	3 January 2018	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	34 Watt	90 Watt