GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs GTS 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 and GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 450
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
3.42

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms GTS 450 by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking730309
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6636.95
Power efficiency2.2113.40
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF106GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 September 2010 (14 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 4 GB has 5498% better value for money than GTS 450.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed783 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1740 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt90 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate25.06111.4
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mm242 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 (3608 data rate) MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.7 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 450 3.42
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.60
+415%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 450 1317
RTX 3050 4 GB 6780
+415%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
−400%
150−160
+400%
Full HD38
−400%
190−200
+400%
1200p27
−381%
130−140
+381%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.391.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
Hitman 3 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−412%
210−220
+412%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
Hitman 3 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−412%
210−220
+412%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
Hitman 3 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−412%
210−220
+412%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

This is how GTS 450 and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 400% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 400% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 381% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.42 17.60
Recency 13 September 2010 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 90 Watt

RTX 3050 4 GB has a 414.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 17.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2668 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2592 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.