GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Quadro FX 3700M

Place in performance ranking	1026	77
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.06	29.48
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	NB9E-GLM3	Turing TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	14 August 2008 (15 years ago)	2 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$925	$399
Current price	$163 (0.2x MSRP)	$374 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 Super has 49033% better value for money than FX 3700M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	2176
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	35.20	224.4
Floating-point performance	352.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 3700M and GeForce RTX 2060 Super compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3700M 1.18

RTX 2060 Super 42.84
+3531%

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms Quadro FX 3700M by 3531% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 3700M 456

RTX 2060 Super 16565
+3533%

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms Quadro FX 3700M by 3533% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX 3700M 5053

RTX 2060 Super 83631
+1555%

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms Quadro FX 3700M by 1555% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −3867%	119 +3867%
1440p	1−2 −6900%	70 +6900%
4K	1−2 −4700%	48 +4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2833%

88
+2833%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3300%	102 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2067%	130 +2067%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2940%	152 +2940%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3275%	135 +3275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1825%	231 +1825%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6000%	122 +6000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −2433%	228 +2433%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4067%	125 +4067%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2267%	71 +2267%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1933%	122 +1933%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2840%	147 +2840%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1825%	77 +1825%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1458%	187 +1458%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −5950%	121 +5950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1511%	145 +1511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3975%	163 +3975%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2267%	71 +2267%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1133%	74 +1133%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2300%	120 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −992%	131 +992%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2025%	85 +2025%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−5600%

114
+5600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −9500%	96 +9500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −11300%	114 +11300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1650%	70 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3900%	40 +3900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4300%	88 +4300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −9700%	98 +9700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −2375%	99 +2375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 −1633%	104 +1633%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −5500%	55−60 +5500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	35
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	29
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −5500%	56 +5500%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1125%	49 +1125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2000%

42
+2000%

This is how FX 3700M and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is 3867% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Super is 6900% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Super is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 11300% faster than the FX 3700M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 2060 Super surpassed FX 3700M in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.18	42.84
Recency	14 August 2008	2 July 2019
Cost	$925	$399
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	175 Watt